False balance, an issue in journalism, occurs when journalists present an issue as being more balanced between opposing viewpoints than the evidence supports. While stemming from an attempt to maintain objectivity, false balance can lead to the distortion of facts. It has been notably problematic in reporting on issues such as climate change and the MMR vaccine controversy, where the overwhelming scientific consensus was misrepresented by giving equal weight to a few dissenting voices. This can create a false sense of disagreement, misinforming the public about the validity of certain viewpoints. Critiques of false balance highlight its potential to skew public perception and understanding, particularly in areas like public health and environmental science. Despite some media today being more willing to challenge false information, it remains a controversial topic in journalism ethics.
You can help expand this article with text translated from the corresponding article in German. (September 2021) Click [show] for important translation instructions.
|
False balance, known colloquially as bothsidesism, is a media bias in which journalists present an issue as being more balanced between opposing viewpoints than the evidence supports. Journalists may present evidence and arguments out of proportion to the actual evidence for each side, or may omit information that would establish one side's claims as baseless. False balance has been cited as a cause of misinformation.
False balance is a bias which usually stems from an attempt to avoid bias and gives unsupported or dubious positions an illusion of respectability. It creates a public perception that some issues are scientifically contentious, though in reality they may not be, therefore creating doubt about the scientific state of research, and can be exploited by interest groups such as corporations like the fossil fuel industry or the tobacco industry, or ideologically motivated activists such as vaccination opponents or creationists.
Examples of false balance in reporting on science issues include the topics of human-caused climate change versus natural climate variability, the health effects of tobacco, the alleged relation between thiomersal and autism, alleged negative side effects of the HPV vaccine, and evolution versus intelligent design.